The three current tennis rules that could be scrapped or changed in the near future

Follow us on Google Discover

As the off-season continues, debate around future tennis rule changes ramps up…

While some are happy with the way tennis is, others want to see a few things change.

Some minor changes have been proposed, such as the removal of ‘lets’ and a stricter application of the ‘shot-clock’ rules.

The big debate, however, surrounds the future of ‘best-of-five-set matches’, which have already been scrapped at several ATP tournaments.

But how and why would those changes be implemented?

Should best-of-five set matches be scrapped?

In years gone by, best-of-five matches were the norm at the biggest tournaments on tour, including the Masters 1000 events, Davis Cup, and Grand Slams.

Today, they are only seen at the four Grand Slams: the Australian Open, the French Open, Wimbledon, and the US Open.

The argument for their removal at the majors is that there isn’t the demand for longer matches anymore.

With attention spans shortening, many think that tennis must adapt to keep the younger generations engaged.

There’s also the argument that reverting to the best-of-three format would alleviate the stress on players’ bodies.

British tennis legend John Lloyd suggested the best-of-three format should be introduced at Grand Slams for that very reason.

“I am a big believer that while the Slams remain best of five sets for the men, we are going to have more and more injuries and we are going to have more pull-outs,” said Lloyd.

“We will get more pull-outs in Slams unless we change the format, in my opinion.”

Former Wimbledon finalist Nick Kyrgios previously proposed an idea that could potentially satisfy everyone.

In Kyrgios’ ideal world, best-of-three would be used during the early rounds of Grand Slam events, but the traditional best-of-five format would return for the quarterfinals.

The idea makes a lot of sense, as there is still a demand to watch the best players on tour battle it out in five-set classics.

If you need any evidence of that, just look at the reception for Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner’s marathon match at the French Open earlier this year.

As the best players usually meet at the end of tournaments, maybe Kyrgios’ idea may be one to implement in the future…

The future of ‘lets’ and the ‘shot clock’

When the ball hits the net and goes in on a serve, the player is given a ‘let’ and has a chance to retake.

That, of course, takes time and slows down the pace of the match.

In a bid to speed things up, don’t be surprised to see ‘lets’ scrapped in the future on both the ATP and WTA Tours.

On the subject of speeding things up, the shot clock could be changed sooner rather than later.

Not only might the time on the clock be reduced, but the rules around the clock may need tweaking.

Currently, when a player catches the ball on a serve, the shot clock will reset, a rule that doesn’t make too much sense.

Removing that will force players to be accurate with their ball tosses and increase the pace of play.

Only time will tell if any of the above changes will be introduced, but it will certainly be worth looking out for.